I find this kinda thought-provoking in a way that fashion generally is not, to me. I think because it’s Kate Winslet wearing this dress, a woman who is openly critical of the extreme level of photo-shopping and body criticism that goes on. It’s intriguing to me. Could this dress be read as a kind of self-conscious critical statement? I don’t know really. I’m kinda leaning towards yes because this is the opposite of shape wear and ‘flattering lines’ — things that are meant to be invisible, meant to trick — this is like a magician performing an illusion and simultaneously showing in the simplest and starkest detail how it is done. ’ Hey, look at me, I’m tricking you! Isn’t that funny?! But kind of amazing?!’ Anyway. Hmmm. She looks smokin’.Kate Winslet in Stella McCartney fall 2011
IS THIS WOMAN REAL? She is perfection personified; I can’t even handle it.
WHOA! Talk about garment illusion! Kudos to the designer of this dress.I actually don’t like this…it’s like Photoshopped images but irl. The dress is designed to make their waist look thinner and boobs look bigger. Not cool…
yea, no thanks. How is ^this^ different than this?
Oh yea, one is made by a ~*fancy designer*~. -_______-
At the same time, it could be read as a commentary on the way we perceive and “read” female bodies—I would LOVE to see Beth Ditto in a Beth-sized version, you know?
(What’s most interesting about this dress to me is that I believed the illusion at first—and was totally unperturbed by it, which I think speaks to how frightening the prevalence of manipulated images is, and how salient those images are, considering that I actively try to avoid looking at them whenever possible.)
